2005A&A...438..491D


Query : 2005A&A...438..491D

2005A&A...438..491D - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 438, 491-505 (2005/8-1)

Formation and evolution of dwarf elliptical galaxies. I. Structural and kinematical properties.

DE RIJCKE S., MICHIELSEN D., DEJONGHE H., ZEILINGER W.W. and HAU G.K.T.

Abstract (from CDS):

This paper is the first in a series in which we present the results of an ESO Large Program on the kinematics and internal dynamics of dwarf elliptical galaxies (dEs). We obtained deep major and minor axis spectra of 15 dEs and broad-band imaging of 22 dEs. Here, we investigate the relations between the parameters that quantify the structure (B-band luminosity LB, half-light radius Re, and mean surface brightness within the half-light radius Ie=LB/2πRe2) and internal dynamics (velocity dispersion σ) of dEs. We confront predictions of the currently popular theories for dE formation and evolution with the observed position of dEs in logLB vs. logσ, logLB vs. logRe, logLB vs. logIe, and logRe vs. logIe diagrams and in the (logσ,logRe,logIe) parameter space in which bright and intermediate-luminosity elliptical galaxies and bulges of spirals define a Fundamental Plane (FP). In order to achieve statistical significance and to cover a parameter interval that is large enough for reliable inferences to be made, we merge the data set presented in this paper with two other recently published, equally large data sets. We show that the dE sequences in the various univariate diagrams are disjunct from those traced by bright and intermediate-luminosity elliptical galaxies and bulges of spirals. It appears that semi-analytical models (SAMs) that incorporate quiescent star formation with an essentially z-independent star-formation efficiency, combined with post-merger starbursts and the dynamical response after supernova-driven gas-loss, are able to reproduce the position of the dEs in the various univariate diagrams. SAMs with star-formation efficiencies that rise as a function of redshift are excluded since they leave the observed sequences traced by dEs virtually unpopulated. dEs tend to lie above the FP and the FP residual declines as a function of luminosity. Again, models that take into account the response after supernova-driven mass-loss correctly predict the position of dEs in the (logσ,logRe,log Ie) parameter space as well as the trend of the FP residual as a function of luminosity. While these findings are clearly a success for the hierarchical-merging picture of galaxy formation, they do not necessarily invalidate the alternative ``harassment'' scenario, which posits that dEs stem from perturbed and stripped late-type disk galaxies that entered clusters and groups of galaxies about 5Gyr ago.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation

Nomenclature: Table 1: [DMD2005] NGC 5898 DWN (Nos DW1-DW2).

Simbad objects: 27

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 27
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 IC 1919 GiG 03 26 02.2132576776 -32 53 40.323783768   13.78   12.60   ~ 81 0
2 2MASX J03262503-3707417 GiC 03 26 25.0085720520 -37 07 41.543028444   16.09       ~ 39 0
3 6dFGS gJ033147.6-350305 GiC 03 31 47.6331242640 -35 03 05.148733932   15.27       ~ 56 0
4 MCG-06-08-027 EmG 03 34 29.4927803424 -35 32 47.329271916   14.50       ~ 87 1
5 2MASX J03352407-3621496 GiC 03 35 24.0910651464 -36 21 49.743672768   15.90       ~ 37 0
6 6dFGS gJ033704.6-353524 GiC 03 37 04.66 -35 35 24.0   15.94   15.65   ~ 46 0
7 ESO 358-43 GiG 03 38 13.5999606360 -33 07 37.960332924   15.26   13.94   ~ 55 0
8 LEDA 74808 EmG 03 38 19.265 -35 07 44.74   15.60 15.34     ~ 59 0
9 ACO S 373 ClG 03 38 29.4 -35 27 08           ~ 1827 0
10 LEDA 74879 GiC 03 40 33.86 -35 01 21.4   15.73   15.54   ~ 42 0
11 2MASX J03405042-3544534 GiC 03 40 50.4165381120 -35 44 54.385434708   15.74       ~ 38 0
12 2MASX J03414141-3510119 GiC 03 41 41.410 -35 10 11.99   15.70       ~ 37 1
13 ESO 358-56 GiP 03 43 22.631 -33 56 25.30   15.58   14.33   ~ 57 0
14 2MASX J03451407-3656123 GiC 03 45 14.0920864008 -36 56 12.009885828   15.32       ~ 55 0
15 LEDA 74993 GiP 03 47 01.52 -36 26 14.9   16.3       ~ 28 0
16 LEDA 13839 GiC 03 47 08.17 -36 19 39.1   16.34       ~ 16 0
17 NGC 3258 EmG 10 28 53.588 -35 36 19.98   12.50 11.72 10.86   ~ 187 0
18 2MASX J10372287-3521371 GiG 10 37 22.8528128184 -35 21 37.442915244   15.6       ~ 19 0
19 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 26 32.1 +12 43 24           ~ 6646 0
20 6dFGS gJ131356.2-161624 GiG 13 13 56.228 -16 16 24.42   15.5       ~ 21 0
21 6dFGS gJ131504.1-162339 GiG 13 15 04.0679474352 -16 23 39.525049536   15.9       ~ 18 0
22 2MASX J13150513-1620451 GiG 13 15 05.0953116624 -16 20 45.525211368   16.93 15.44     ~ 17 0
23 NGC 5044 BiC 13 15 23.9607836592 -16 23 07.547751744   11.9   10.74   ~ 501 0
24 2MASX J13164875-1620397 GiP 13 16 48.7308496776 -16 20 39.463437444   15.80   14.57   ~ 19 0
25 LEDA 792560 AG? 15 18 13.0289649360 -24 11 46.002108984   15.66       ~ 11 0
26 NGC 5898 EmG 15 18 13.5683042256 -24 05 52.428845076   12.37 11.52 10.71   ~ 153 1
27 LEDA 792714 AG? 15 18 44.7133964184 -24 10 51.454756020   16.10       ~ 10 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2005A&A...438..491D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu