XLSSC 046 , the SIMBAD biblio

XLSSC 046 , the SIMBAD biblio (37 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2024.04.25CEST19:24:05

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2005MNRAS.359.1250A 1 11 36 Batch discovery of nine z∼ 1 clusters using X-ray and K or R, z' images. ANDREON S., VALTCHANOV I., JONES L.R., et al.
2006MNRAS.371.1427B 1 16 49 XMM-LSS discovery of a z = 1.22 galaxy cluster. BREMER M.N., VALTCHANOV I., WILLIS J., et al.
2006MNRAS.372..578P 12 3 72 The XMM Large-Scale Structure survey: the X-ray pipeline and survey selection function. PACAUD F., PIERRE M., REFREGIER A., et al.
2009Natur.458..603C 14 5 143 Early assembly of the most massive galaxies. COLLINS C.A., STOTT J.P., HILTON M., et al.
2009AJ....138.1271D 15       D               3 71 55 An intensive Hubble space telescope survey for z>1 type Ia supernovae by targeting galaxy clusters. DAWSON K.S., ALDERING G., AMANULLAH R., et al.
2009A&A...507..147A 84           X         2 4 71 JKCS041: a colour-detected galaxy cluster at zphot∼ 1.9 with deep potential well as confirmed by X-ray data. ANDREON S., MAUGHAN B., TRINCHIERI G., et al.
2010ApJ...718...23S 94       D         F     1 20 94 The XMM cluster survey: the build-up of stellar mass in brightest cluster galaxies at high redshift. STOTT J.P., COLLINS C.A., SAHLEN M., et al.
2011A&A...526A..18A 92       D       C       1 72 57 The XMM-LSS survey: optical assessment and properties of different X-ray selected cluster classes. ADAMI C., MAZURE A., PIERRE M., et al.
2011ApJ...737...59J 362       D S   X C       8 35 92 Scaling relations and overabundance of massive clusters at z ≳ 1 from weak-lensing studies with the Hubble space telescope. JEE M.J., DAWSON K.S., HOEKSTRA H., et al.
2011A&A...535A...4R viz 15       D               1 225 108 Observational constraints on the redshift evolution of X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters out to z ∼ 1.5. REICHERT A., BOEHRINGER H., FASSBENDER R., et al.
2012MNRAS.419.2821C 15       D               1 18 14 The evolution of K* and the halo occupation distribution since z= 1.5: observations versus simulations. CAPOZZI D., COLLINS C.A., STOTT J.P., et al.
2012ApJ...745...32B 15       D               1 75 42 The Hubble space telescope cluster supernova survey. II. The type Ia supernova rate in high-redshift galaxy clusters. BARBARY K., ALDERING G., AMANULLAH R., et al.
2012ApJ...750....1M 54       D     X         2 76 36 The Hubble space telescope cluster supernova survey. III. Correlated properties of type Ia supernovae and their hosts at 0.9 < z < 1.46. MEYERS J., ALDERING G., BARBARY K., et al.
2012MNRAS.425.2058B 289       D     X C F     6 7 43 Measurement of the intracluster light at z ∼ 1. BURKE C., COLLINS C.A., STOTT J.P., et al.
2012MNRAS.427..550L 15       D               1 150 160 Evidence for significant growth in the stellar mass of brightest cluster galaxies over the past 10 billion years. LIDMAN C., SUHERLI J., MUZZIN A., et al.
2013MNRAS.430..134W 94       D     X C       2 73 32 Distant galaxy clusters in the XMM Large Scale Structure survey. WILLIS J.P., CLERC N., BREMER M.N., et al.
2013ApJ...767...39M 41           X         1 13 70 Discovery of a rich cluster at z = 1.63 using the rest-frame 1.6 µm "stellar bump sequence" method. MUZZIN A., WILSON G., DEMARCO R., et al.
2013MNRAS.433..825L 290       D     X         8 20 74 The importance of major mergers in the build up of stellar mass in brightest cluster galaxies at z = 1. LIDMAN C., IACOBUTA G., BAUER A.E., et al.
2013MNRAS.434..878S 16       D               2 32 23 The mass-concentration relation in massive galaxy clusters at redshift ∼ 1. SERENO M. and COVONE G.
2014MNRAS.441..203D viz 411       D     X   F     10 14 58 Larger sizes of massive quiescent early-type galaxies in clusters than in the field at 0.8 < z < 1.5. DELAYE L., HUERTAS-COMPANY M., MEI S., et al.
2014A&A...566A.140G viz 16       D               1 134 22 Mining the gap: evolution of the magnitude gap in X-ray galaxy groups from the 3-square-degree XMM coverage of CFHTLS. GOZALIASL G., FINOGUENOV A., KHOSROSHAHI H.G., et al.
2015MNRAS.449.2024S 16       D               1 106 30 The mass-concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects. SERENO M., GIOCOLI C., ETTORI S., et al.
2015MNRAS.450.3665S viz 16       D               1 430 35 CoMaLit - III. Literature catalogues of weak lensing clusters of galaxies (LC2). SERENO M.
2016ApJ...816...98Z viz 16       D               1 109 31 Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data. I. Stellar mass growth of bright central galaxies since z∼1.2. ZHANG Y., MILLER C., McKAY T., et al.
2016MNRAS.455..892G viz 16       D               1 353 14 The galaxy cluster concentration-mass scaling relation. GROENER A.M., GOLDBERG D.M. and SERENO M.
2016MNRAS.457.2209C 860       D     X C F     20 15 25 The accelerated build-up of the red sequence in high-redshift galaxy clusters. CERULO P., COUCH W.J., LIDMAN C., et al.
2017A&A...597A.122S viz 341       D     X C       8 93 9 Cluster and field elliptical galaxies at z ∼ 1.3 The marginal role of the environment and the relevance of the galaxy central regions. SARACCO P., GARGIULO A., CIOCCA F., et al.
2017MNRAS.472..254C 179       D     X   F     4 18 8 The morphological transformation of red sequence galaxies in clusters since z ∼ 1. CERULO P., COUCH W.J., LIDMAN C., et al.
2018MNRAS.477.5517W 16       D               1 19 1 X-ray versus infrared selection of distant galaxy clusters: a case study using the XMM-LSS and SpARCS cluster samples. WILLIS J.P., RAMOS-CEJA M.E., MUZZIN A., et al.
2018A&A...620A..18L viz 305       D     X         8 9 2 The XXL Survey. XXXIII. Chandra constraints on the AGN contamination of z > 1 XXL galaxy clusters. LOGAN C.H.A., MAUGHAN B.J., BREMER M.N., et al.
2019MNRAS.484.2281S 669     A D     X C       16 11 4 Age, metallicity, and star formation history of spheroidal galaxies in cluster at z ∼ 1.2. SARACCO P., LA BARBERA F., GARGIULO A., et al.
2020MNRAS.491.1777S 681     A D     X C       16 32 ~ The Fundamental Plane of cluster spheroidal galaxies at z 1.3: evidence for mass-dependent evolution. SARACCO P., GARGIULO A., LA BARBERA F., et al.
2020ApJ...889..185K viz 43           X         1 7 ~ The role of environment in galaxy evolution in the SERVS survey. I. Density maps and cluster candidates. KREFTING N., SAJINA A., LACY M., et al.
2020A&A...642A.124T 17       D               3 36 ~ The XXL Survey. XLII. Detection and characterisation of the galaxy population of distant galaxy clusters in the XXL-N/VIDEO field: A tale of variety. TRUDEAU A., GARREL C., WILLIS J., et al.
2021ApJ...911...82C viz 174           X C       3 388 ~ Cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster sparsity, cluster gas mass fraction, and baryon acoustic oscillation data. CORASANITI P.-S., SERENO M. and ETTORI S.
2021A&A...649A..42C viz 17       D               2 141 14 Physical properties of brightest cluster galaxies up to redshift 1.80 based on HST data. CHU A., DURRET F. and MARQUEZ I.
2023MNRAS.520.3027S 188           X C       3 1 1 The star formation history and the nature of the mass-metallicity relation of passive galaxies at 1.0 < z < 1.4 from VANDELS. SARACCO P., LA BARBERA F., DE PROPRIS R., et al.

goto View the references in ADS