SIMBAD references

2010MNRAS.406.1318H - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 406, 1318-1336 (2010/August-1)

The lensing efficiencies of MACS X-ray-selected versus RCS optically selected galaxy clusters.

HORESH A., MAOZ D., EBELING H., SEIDEL G. and BARTELMANN M.

Abstract (from CDS):

The statistics of strongly lensed arcs in samples of galaxy clusters provide information on cluster structure that is complementary to that from individual clusters. However, samples of clusters that have been analysed to date have been either small, heterogeneous or observed with limited angular resolution. We measure the lensed-arc statistics of 97 clusters imaged at high angular resolution with the Hubble Space Telescope, identifying lensed arcs using two automated arc-detection algorithms. The sample includes similar numbers of X-ray-selected [MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS)] and optically selected [Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS)] clusters, and spans cluster redshifts in the range 0.2 < z < 1. We compile a catalogue of 42 arcs in the X-ray-selected subsample and seven arcs in the optical subsample. All but five of these arcs are reported here for the first time. At 0.3 ≤ z ≤ 0.7, the X-ray-selected clusters have a significantly higher mean frequency of arcs, 1.2±0.2 per cluster, versus 0.2±0.1 in the optical sample. The strikingly different lensing efficiencies indicate that X-ray clusters trace much larger mass concentrations, despite the similar optical luminosities of the X-ray and optical clusters. The mass difference is supported also by the lower space density of the X-ray clusters and by the small Einstein radii of the few arcs in the optical sample. Higher order effects, such as differences in concentration or substructure, may also contribute.

Abstract Copyright: © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 RAS

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: clusters: general - gravitational lensing: strong

VizieR on-line data: <Available at CDS (J/MNRAS/406/1318): table1.dat table2.dat table3.dat table4.dat table5.dat table6.dat>

Nomenclature: Fig. 1, Table 6: [HME2010] MACS JHHMM.m+DDMM AN, [HME2010] RCS JHHMMSS+DDMM.m A, N=49.

CDS comments: Cl 0024+24 is a misprint for ClG 0024+16

Simbad objects: 91

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2010MNRAS.406.1318H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu