SIMBAD references

2012ApJ...751..134M - Astrophys. J., 751, 134 (2012/June-1)

Inverse Compton X-ray emission from supernovae with compact progenitors: application to SN2011fe.

MARGUTTI R., SODERBERG A.M., CHOMIUK L., CHEVALIER R., HURLEY K., MILISAVLJEVIC D., FOLEY R.J., HUGHES J.P., SLANE P., FRANSSON C., MOE M., BARTHELMY S., BOYNTON W., BRIGGS M., CONNAUGHTON V., COSTA E., CUMMINGS J., DEL MONTE E., ENOS H., FELLOWS C., FEROCI M., FUKAZAWA Y., GEHRELS N., GOLDSTEN J., GOLOVIN D., HANABATA Y., HARSHMAN K., KRIMM H., LITVAK M.L., MAKISHIMA K., MARISALDI M., MITROFANOV I.G., MURAKAMI T., OHNO M., PALMER D.M., SANIN A.B., STARR R., SVINKIN D., TAKAHASHI T., TASHIRO M., TERADA Y. and YAMAOKA K.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN 2011fe using Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT), UVOT, and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical properties of SN 2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass-loss rate {dot}M < 2 x 10–9 M/yr (3σ c.l.) for wind velocity vw= 100 km/s. Our result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN 2011fe and argues against Roche lobe overflowing subgiants and main-sequence secondary stars if ≳ 1% of the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment (nCSM< 150/cm3) for 2x1015 ≲ R ≲ 5x1016 cm around the progenitor site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al. to constrain the post-shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star we estimate that the shock breakout pulse was likely not detectable by current satellites.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): radiation mechanisms: non-thermal - supernovae: individual: SN2011fe

Simbad objects: 18

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2012ApJ...751..134M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu