2014MNRAS.438.1191S

The recent supernova (SN) known as SN 2009ip had dramatic precursor eruptions followed by an even brighter explosion in 2012. Its pre-2012 observations make it the best documented SN progenitor in history, but have fuelled debate about the nature of its 2012 explosion - whether it was a true SN or some type of violent non-terminal event. Both could power shock interaction with circumstellar material (CSM), but only a core-collapse SN provides a self-consistent explanation. The persistent broad emission lines in the spectrum require a relatively large ejecta mass, and a corresponding kinetic energy of at least 10⁵¹erg, while the faint 2012a event is consistent with published models of core-collapse SNe from compact ( ∼ 60 R_☉) blue supergiants. The light curves of SN 2009ip and another Type IIn, SN 2010mc, were nearly identical; we demonstrate that their spectra match as well, and that both are standard SNe IIn. Our observations contradict the recent claim that the late-time spectrum of SN 2009ip is returning to its progenitor's luminous blue variable-like state, and we show the that late-time spectra of SN 2009ip closely resemble the spectra of SN 1987A. Moreover, SN 2009ip's changing Hα equivalent width after explosion matches behaviour typically seen in core-collapse SNe IIn. Several key facts about SN 2009ip and SN 2010mc argue strongly in favour of a core-collapse interpretation, and make a non-terminal 10⁵⁰erg event implausible. The most straightforward and self-consistent interpretation is that SN 2009ip was an initially faint core-collapse explosion of a blue supergiant that produced about half as much 56Ni as SN 1987A, with most of the peak luminosity from CSM interaction.