2016A&A...588A..68G


Query : 2016A&A...588A..68G

2016A&A...588A..68G - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 588A, 68-68 (2016/4-1)

Warm ionized gas in CALIFA early-type galaxies.

GOMES J.M., PAPADEROS P., KEHRIG C., VILCHEZ J.M., LEHNERT M.D., SANCHEZ S.F., ZIEGLER B., BREDA I., DOS REIS S.N., IGLESIAS-PARAMO J., BLAND-HAWTHORN J., GALBANY L., BOMANS D.J., ROSALES-ORTEGA F.F., CID FERNANDES R., WALCHER C.J., FALCON-BARROSO J., GARCIA-BENITO R., MARQUEZ I., DEL OLMO A., MASEGOSA J., MOLLA M., MARINO R.A., GONZALEZ DELGADO R.M. and LOPEZ-SANCHEZ A.R.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. The morphological, spectroscopic, and kinematical properties of the warm interstellar medium (wim) in early-type galaxies (ETGs) hold key observational constraints to nuclear activity and the buildup history of these massive, quiescent systems. High-quality integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data with a wide spectral and spatial coverage, such as those from the CALIFA survey, offer an unprecedented opportunity for advancing our understanding of the wim in ETGs.
Aims. This article centers on a 2D investigation of the wim component in 32 nearby (<=150Mpc) ETGs from CALIFA, complementing a previous 1D analysis of the same sample.
Methods. The analysis presented here includes Hα intensity and equivalent width (EW) maps and radial profiles, diagnostic emission-line ratios, and ionized-gas and stellar kinematics. It is supplemented by τ-ratio maps, which are a more efficient means to quantify the role of photoionization by the post-AGB stellar component than alternative mechanisms (e.g., AGN, low-level star formation).
Results. Confirming and strengthening our previous conclusions, we find that ETGs span a broad continuous sequence in the properties of their wim, exemplified by two characteristic classes. The first (type i) comprises systems with a nearly constant EW(Hα) in their extranuclear component, which quantitatively agrees with (but is no proof of) the hypothesis that photoionization by the post-AGB stellar component is the main driver of extended wim emission. The second class (type ii) stands for virtually wim-evacuated ETGs with a very low (<=0.5Å), outwardly increasing EW(Hα). These two classes appear indistinguishable from one another by their LINER-specific emission-line ratios in their extranuclear component. Here we extend the tentative classification we proposed previously by the type i+, which is assigned to a subset of type i ETGs exhibiting ongoing low-level star-forming activity in their periphery. This finding along with faint traces of localized star formation in the extranuclear component of several of our sample galaxies points to a non-negligible contribution by OB stars to the global ionizing photon budget in ETGs. Additionally, our data again highlight the diversity of ETGs in their gaseous and stellar kinematics. While in one half of our sample, gas and stars show similar (yet not necessarily identical) velocity patterns that are both dominated by rotation along the major galaxy axis, our analysis also documents several cases of kinematical decoupling between gas and stars, or rotation along the minor galaxy axis. We point out that the generally very low (<=1Å) EW(Hα) of ETGs requires a careful quantitative assessment of potential observational and analysis biases in studies of their wim. With standard emission-line fitting tools, Balmer emission lines become progressively difficult to detect below an EW(Hα) ∼3Å, therefore our current understanding of the presence and 2D emission patterns and kinematics of the diffuse wim ETGs may be severely incomplete. We demonstrate that at the typical emission-line detection threshold of ∼2Å in previous studies, most of the extranuclear wim emission in an ETG may evade detection, which could in turn cause ETGs to be classified as entirely gas-devoid systems.
Conclusions. This study adds further observational evidence for a considerable heterogeneity among ETGs with regard to the physical properties and 2D kinematics of their extended wim component, and it clearly shows that a comprehensive understanding of these systems requires IFS studies over their entire optical extent.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO, 2016

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: nuclei - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: star formation

Simbad objects: 38

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 38
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 UGC 29 GiG 00 04 33.7482674640 +28 18 06.171106644   15.2       ~ 33 0
2 NGC 160 AG? 00 36 04.0982272704 +23 57 28.502827092   13.7       ~ 94 0
3 IC 1683 GiG 01 22 38.867 +34 26 13.21   14.2       ~ 88 0
4 NGC 1167 LIN 03 01 42.3322774176 +35 12 20.300948892   13.84 12.77     ~ 355 2
5 NGC 1349 LIN 03 31 27.5125084008 +04 22 51.205128636   15.00       ~ 73 0
6 IC 540 Sy2 09 30 10.261 +07 54 09.10   14.8       ~ 68 0
7 NGC 2918 GiG 09 35 44.0389725240 +31 42 19.742708448   13.6       ~ 60 0
8 NGC 3106 LIN 10 04 05.2518653088 +31 11 07.659854232   14.0       ~ 100 0
9 NGC 3300 LIN 10 36 38.4367313856 +14 10 15.994982964   13.4       ~ 109 0
10 UGC 5771 LIN 10 37 19.3424977080 +43 35 15.305053488   14.6       ~ 78 1
11 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 775 1
12 NGC 3615 LIN 11 18 06.6511346544 +23 23 50.411983200   14.0       ~ 61 0
13 NGC 4003 LIN 11 57 59.0256271248 +23 07 29.592588396   14.8       ~ 77 0
14 NGC 4470 H2G 12 29 37.8066943368 +07 49 27.284422224   12.9       ~ 239 0
15 NGC 4816 GiG 12 56 12.1508733240 +27 44 43.773192276 14.25 13.80 12.84     ~ 138 1
16 UGC 8234 GiG 13 08 46.5057756192 +62 16 18.162586956   13.8       ~ 47 0
17 IC 944 GiP 13 51 30.897 +14 05 31.66   14.7       ~ 78 0
18 UGC 8778 LIN 13 52 06.6808959096 +38 04 01.467729408   14.8       ~ 57 0
19 NGC 5966 LIN 15 35 52.1114846664 +39 46 08.023434852   13.9       ~ 76 0
20 NVSS J160640+300558 rG 16 06 40.182 +30 05 56.65   14.4       ~ 116 0
21 NGC 6081 LIN 16 12 56.8487186784 +09 52 01.414323552   14.4       ~ 65 0
22 NGC 6125 AG? 16 19 11.5344941208 +57 59 02.863041504   13.0       ~ 101 0
23 7C 162329.50+410025.00 Bla 16 25 10.3269925320 +40 53 34.331514324   13.8       ~ 130 1
24 NGC 6150 LIN 16 25 49.9649 +40 29 19.406   14.9       ~ 68 1
25 NGC 6173 LIN 16 29 44.8864037664 +40 48 41.890972320   14.0       ~ 168 0
26 UGC 10693 GiG 17 04 52.969 +41 51 55.75   14.2       ~ 42 0
27 UGC 10695 LIN 17 05 05.5788082104 +43 02 35.344416012   14.7       ~ 46 0
28 NGC 6338 Bla 17 15 22.9752 +57 24 40.312   14.2   8   ~ 184 2
29 UGC 10905 LIN 17 34 06.4351060416 +25 20 38.250057372   14.6       ~ 44 0
30 NGC 6411 AG? 17 35 32.8446342384 +60 48 48.236693796   13.2       ~ 113 0
31 NGC 6427 GiP 17 43 38.5939706616 +25 29 38.119328808   14.6       ~ 42 0
32 NGC 6515 G 17 57 25.1935412208 +50 43 41.231792496   14.3       ~ 41 0
33 NGC 6762 Sy2 19 05 37.0826868072 +63 56 02.712621192   14.2       ~ 53 0
34 NGC 7025 LIN 21 07 47.3404766136 +16 20 09.224408688   14.10       ~ 74 0
35 NGC 7194 GiG 22 03 30.9364457736 +12 38 12.415007364   14.5       ~ 56 0
36 NGC 7236 LIN 22 14 44.9886363216 +13 50 47.450963760   14.3 14.3     ~ 275 2
37 NGC 7436 GiG 22 57 57.5438666496 +26 08 59.953374888   15.5       ~ 87 1
38 NGC 7550 LIN 23 15 16.0606 +18 57 41.284   13.9   11.85   ~ 126 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2016A&A...588A..68G and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu