SIMBAD references

2016ApJ...825...98H - Astrophys. J., 825, 98-98 (2016/July-2)

Warm jupiters are less lonely than hot jupiters: close neighbors.

HUANG C., WU Y. and TRIAUD A.H.M.J.

Abstract (from CDS):

Exploiting the Kepler transit data, we uncover a dramatic distinction in the prevalence of sub-Jovian companions between systems that contain hot Jupiters (HJs) (periods inward of 10 days) and those that host warm Jupiters (WJs) (periods between 10 and 200 days). HJs, with the singular exception of WASP-47b, do not have any detectable inner or outer planetary companions (with periods inward of 50 days and sizes down to 2 REarth). Restricting ourselves to inner companions, our limits reach down to 1 REarth. In stark contrast, half of the WJs are closely flanked by small companions. Statistically, the companion fractions for hot and WJs are mutually exclusive, particularly in regard to inner companions. The high companion fraction of WJs also yields clues to their formation. The WJs that have close-by siblings should have low orbital eccentricities and low mutual inclinations. The orbital configurations of these systems are reminiscent of those of the low-mass close-in planetary systems abundantly discovered by the Kepler mission. This, and other arguments, lead us to propose that these WJs are formed in situ. There are indications that there may be a second population of WJs with different characteristics. In this picture, WASP-47b could be regarded as the extending tail of the in situ WJs into the HJ region and does not represent the generic formation route for HJs.

Abstract Copyright: © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Journal keyword(s): methods: statistical - planets and satellites: general

Simbad objects: 166

goto Full paper

goto View the reference in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2016ApJ...825...98H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


2019.10.16-20:14:37

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact