2017ApJ...851L..25F -
Astrophys. J., 851, L25-L25 (2017/December-3)
Where are LIGO's big black holes?
FISHBACH M. and HOLZ D.E.
Abstract (from CDS):
In LIGO's O1 and O2 observational runs, the detectors were sensitive to stellar-mass binary black hole (BBH) coalescences with component masses up to 100 M☉, with binaries with primary masses above 40 M☉ representing >=90% of the total accessible sensitive volume. Nonetheless, of the 5.9 detections (GW150914, LVT151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, and GW170814) reported by LIGO-Virgo, the most massive binary detected was GW150914 with a primary component mass of ∼36 M☉, far below the detection mass limit. Furthermore, there are theoretical arguments in favor of an upper mass gap, predicting an absence of black holes in the mass range 50 M 135 M☉. We argue that the absence of detected binary systems with component masses heavier than ∼40 M☉ may be preliminary evidence for this upper mass gap. By allowing for the presence of a mass gap, we find weaker constraints on the shape of the underlying mass distribution of BBHs. We fit a power-law distribution with an upper mass cutoff to real and simulated BBH mass measurements, finding that the first 3.9 BBHs favor shallow power-law slopes α3 and an upper mass cutoff M{max}∼40 M☉. This inferred distribution is entirely consistent with the two recently reported detections, GW170608 and GW170814. We show that with ∼10 additional LIGO-Virgo BBH detections, fitting the BH mass distribution will provide strong evidence for an upper mass gap if one exists.
Abstract Copyright:
© 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Journal keyword(s):
binaries: general - gravitational waves - methods: data analysis - stars: black holes - stars: massive - stars: massive
Simbad objects:
6
Full paper
View the references in ADS
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2017ApJ...851L..25F and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu