SIMBAD references

Context. The reduced speed of light approximation is used in a variety of simulations of the epoch of reionization and galaxy formation. Its popularity stems from its ability to drastically reduce the computing cost of a simulation by allowing the use of larger and therefore fewer timesteps to reach a solution. This approximation is physically motivated by the fact that ionization fronts rarely propagate faster than some fraction of the speed of light. However, no global proof of the physical validity of this approach is available and possible artefacts resulting from this approximation therefore need to be identified and characterized to allow its proper use.
Aims. In this paper we investigate the impact of the reduced speed of light approximation on the predicted properties of the intergalactic medium.
Methods. To this end we used fully coupled radiation-hydrodynamics RAMSES-CUDATON simulations of the epoch of reionization.
Results. We find that reducing the speed of light by a factor 5 (20, 100) leads to overestimating the post-reionization average volume-weighted neutral hydrogen fraction by a similar factor ∼5 (20, 100) with respect to full speed of light simulations. We show that the error is driven by the hydrogen - photon chemistry by considering the analytical solution for a strongly ionized hydrogen gas in photoionization equilibrium. In this regime, reducing the speed of light has the same effect as artificially reducing the photon density or the hydrogen photoionization cross section and leads to an underestimated ionizing intensity. We confirm this interpretation by running additional simulations using a reduced speed of light in the photon propagation module, but this time we keep the true speed of light in the chemistry module. With this set-up, the post-reionization neutral hydrogen fractions converge to the full speed of light value, which validates our explanation. Increasing spatial resolution beyond a cell size of 1 kpc physical, so as to better resolve Lyman-limit systems, does not significantly affect our conclusions.