SIMBAD references

2020A&A...641A.177M - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 641A, 177-177 (2020/9-1)

Stripped-envelope core-collapse supernova 56Ni masses. Persistently larger values than supernovae type II.

MEZA N. and ANDERSON J.P.

Abstract (from CDS):


Context. The mass of synthesised radioactive material is an important power source for all supernova (SN) types. In addition, the difference of 56Ni yields statistics are relevant to constrain progenitor paths and explosion mechanisms.
Aims. Here, we re-estimate the nucleosynthetic yields of 56Ni for a well-observed and well-defined sample of stripped-envelope SNe (SE-SNe) in a uniform manner. This allows us to investigate whether the observed hydrogen-rich-stripped-envelope (SN II-SE SN) 56Ni separation is due to real differences between these SN types or because of systematic errors in the estimation methods.
Methods. We compiled a sample of well-observed SE-SNe and measured 56Ni masses through three different methods proposed in the literature: first, the classic "Arnett rule"; second the more recent prescription of Khatami & Kasen (2019ApJ...878...56K) and third using the tail luminostiy to provide lower limit 56Ni masses. These SE-SN distributions were then compared to those compiled in this article.
Results. Arnett's rule, as previously shown, gives 56Ni masses for SE-SNe that are considerably higher than SNe II. While for the distributions calculated using both the Khatami & Kasen (2019ApJ...878...56K) prescription and Tail 56Ni masses are offset to lower values than "Arnett values", their 56Ni distributions are still statistically higher than that of SNe II. Our results are strongly driven by a lack of SE-SN with low 56Ni masses, that are, in addition, strictly lower limits. The lowest SE-SN 56Ni mass in our sample is of 0.015M, below which are more than 25% of SNe II.
Conclusions. We conclude that there exist real, intrinsic differences in the mass of synthesised radioactive material between SNe II and SE-SNe (types IIb, Ib, and Ic). Any proposed current or future CC SN progenitor scenario and explosion mechanism must be able to explain why and how such differences arise or outline a bias in current SN samples yet to be fully explored.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2020

Journal keyword(s): supernovae: general

VizieR on-line data: <Available at CDS (J/A+A/641/A177): tablea1.dat tablea2.dat tablec1.dat>

Status at CDS : Tables of objects will be appraised for possible ingestion in SIMBAD.

Simbad objects: 288

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2020A&A...641A.177M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


2021.11.30-09:30:53

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact