2004A&A...415..349R


Query : 2004A&A...415..349R

2004A&A...415..349R - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 415, 349-376 (2004/2-3)

Stellar and wind parameters of Galactic O-stars. The influence of line-blocking/blanketing.

REPOLUST T., PULS J. and HERRERO A.

Abstract (from CDS):

We have re-analyzed the Galactic O-star sample from Puls (1996A&A...305..171P) by means of line-blanketed NLTE model atmospheres in order to investigate the influence of line-blocking/blanketing on the derived parameters. The analysis has been carried out by fitting the photospheric and wind lines from H and He. In most cases we obtained a good fit, but we have also found certain inconsistencies which are probably related to a still inadequate treatment of the wind structure. These inconsistencies comprise the line cores of Hγ and Hβ in supergiants (the synthetic profiles are too weak when the mass-loss rate is determined by matching Hα) and the ``generalized dilution effect'' (cf. Voels, 1989ApJ...340.1073V) which is still present in HeI 4471 of cooler supergiants and giants. Compared to pure H/He plane-parallel models we found a decrease in effective temperatures which is largest at earliest spectral types and for supergiants (with a maximum shift of roughly 8000K). This finding is explained by the fact that line-blanketed models of hot stars have photospheric He ionization fractions similar to those from unblanketed models at higher Teff and higher logg. Consequently, any line-blanketed analysis based on the He ionization equilibrium results in lower Teff-values along with a reduction of either logg or helium abundance (if the reduction of logg is prohibited by the Balmer line wings). Stellar radii and mass-loss rates, on the other hand, remain more or less unaffected by line-blanketing. We have calculated ``new'' spectroscopic masses and compared them with previous results. Although the former mass discrepancy Herrero et al. (1992A&A...261..209H) becomes significantly reduced, a systematic trend for masses below 50M seems to remain: The spectroscopically derived values are smaller than the ``evolutionary masses'' by roughly 10M. Additionally, a significant fraction of our sample stars stays over-abundant in He, although the actual values were found to be lower than previously determined. Also the wind-momentum luminosity relation (WLR) changes because of lower luminosities and almost unmodified wind-momentum rates. Compared to previous results, the separation of the WLR as a function of luminosity class is still present but now the WLR for giants/dwarfs is consistent with theoretical predictions. We argue that the derived mass-loss rates of stars with Hα in emission are affected by clumping in the lower wind region. If the predictions from different and independent theoretical simulations (Vink et al., 2000A&A...362..295V; Pauldrach et al., 2003, in Proc. IAU Symp., 209, in press; 03, Puls et al., 2003, in Proc. IAU Symp., 212, 61) that the WLR should be independent of luminosity class were correct, a typical clumping factor <ρ2>/<ρ>2≃5 should be derived by ``unifying'' the different WLRs.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): stars: atmospheres - stars: distances - stars: early-type - stars: fundamental parameters - stars: mass loss - stars: wind, outflows

Simbad objects: 27

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 27
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2023
#notes
1 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 10840 1
2 HD 13268 * 02 11 29.7003301008 +56 09 31.721738760 7.48 8.24 8.18     ON8.5IIIn 178 0
3 HD 14947 s*b 02 26 46.9899705528 +58 52 33.118732380 7.83 8.44 7.98     O4.5If 251 0
4 HD 15558 Y*O 02 32 42.5366901168 +61 27 21.572901360 7.82 8.37 7.87 7.34 6.94 O4.5III(f) 313 0
5 HD 15629 Y*O 02 33 20.5873992264 +61 31 18.188762844 8.23 8.85 8.42     O4.5V((fc)) 237 0
6 HD 18409 * 03 00 29.7126315336 +62 43 19.052057856 9.832 8.72 8.40     O9.7Ib 76 0
7 * ksi Per ** 03 58 57.9022917 +35 47 27.713205 3.190 4.080 4.060 3.88 3.89 O7.5III(n)((f)) 825 0
8 * alf Cam s*b 04 54 03.0103983 +66 20 33.636467 3.47 4.34 4.29 4.18 4.18 O9Ia 658 1
9 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 16973 1
10 * zet Pup BY* 08 03 35.04754 -40 00 11.3321 0.89 1.98 2.25 2.36 2.58 O4I(n)fp 1146 1
11 HD 93128 SB* 10 43 54.3957741024 -59 32 57.497266716 8.82 8.97 8.77 9.40 8.71 O3.5V((fc))z 97 1
12 HD 93129 ** 10 43 57.462360 -59 32 51.27000 6.26 7.840 7.884 7.839   O2If*+O3.5V((f)) 200 1
13 HD 93250 * 10 44 45.0275085072 -59 33 54.680974848 6.73 8.12 7.50 8.38   O4III(fc) 310 0
14 HD 303308 ** 10 45 05.9147911152 -59 40 05.925360036 7.45 8.30 8.17 7.92 7.75 O4.5V((fc)) 296 0
15 * zet Oph Be* 16 37 09.5390545 -10 34 01.529471 1.73 2.58 2.56 2.46 2.50 O9.2IVnn 1824 2
16 HD 190864 Em* 20 05 39.8022808800 +35 36 27.991297908 7.18 7.93 7.78     O6.5III(f) 222 0
17 HD 191423 * 20 08 07.1135347944 +42 36 21.962454480 7.43 8.19 8.03     ON9II-IIInn 111 0
18 HD 192639 s*b 20 14 30.4275801672 +37 21 13.816276704 6.83 7.46 7.11     O7.5Iabf 290 0
19 HD 193514 Em* 20 19 08.4971150880 +39 16 24.253036608 7.32 7.83 7.38     O7Ib(f) 186 0
20 HD 193682 Em* 20 20 08.9387110032 +37 49 51.313158876 8.44 8.87 8.42     O4.5IV(f) 86 0
21 Ass Cyg OB 2 As* 20 33.2 +41 19           ~ 915 0
22 * 68 Cyg SB* 21 18 27.1862219256 +43 56 45.399147864 4.05 4.99 5.00     O7.5IIIn((f)) 372 0
23 HD 207198 * 21 44 53.2791389640 +62 27 38.048647248 5.61 6.25 5.94 5.66 5.49 O8.5II 344 0
24 * 19 Cep * 22 05 08.7897533088 +62 16 47.332569936 4.36 5.19 5.11 4.95 4.92 O9Ib 377 0
25 * lam Cep s*b 22 11 30.5765111040 +59 24 52.154264880 4.55 5.29 5.05 4.77 4.62 O6.5I(n)fp 680 1
26 HD 210809 s*b 22 11 38.6004719208 +52 25 47.950615308 6.7 7.61 7.56     O9Iab 211 0
27 HD 217086 Y*O 22 56 47.1887590800 +62 43 37.657173900 7.88 8.30 7.66 8.35   O7Vnn((f))z 254 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2004A&A...415..349R and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


2023.09.23-10:32:02

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact