KOI-5654 , the SIMBAD biblio

KOI-5654 , the SIMBAD biblio (8 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2024.04.24CEST18:33:11


Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords
in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS)
Title First 3 Authors
2015ApJ...801....3M viz 16       D               1 3357 109 Photometric amplitude distribution of stellar rotation of KOIs–Indication for spin-orbit alignment of cool stars and high obliquity for hot stars. MAZEH T., PERETS H.B., McQUILLAN A., et al.
2015ApJS..217...31M viz 16       D               1 2033 213 Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. VI. Planet sample from Q1–Q16 (47 months). MULLALLY F., COUGHLIN J.L., THOMPSON S.E., et al.
2015ApJ...807..170H viz 16       D               1 2117 10 Time variation of Kepler transits induced by stellar Spots–A way to distinguish between prograde and retrograde motion. II. Application to KOIs. HOLCZER T., SHPORER A., MAZEH T., et al.
2015ApJ...809....8B viz 16       D               1 112329 282 Terrestrial planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf sample. BURKE C.J., CHRISTIANSEN J.L., MULLALLY F., et al.
2016ApJ...822...86M viz 16       D               1 6130 337 False positive probabilities for all Kepler objects of interest: 1284 newly validated planets and 428 likely false positives. MORTON T.D., BRYSON S.T., COUGHLIN J.L., et al.
2016ApJS..225....9H viz 16       D               2 2132 124 Transit timing observations from Kepler. IX. Catalog of the full long-cadence data set. HOLCZER T., MAZEH T., NACHMANI G., et al.
2017AJ....153..117H viz 16       D               1 170 51 Assessing the effect of stellar companions from high-resolution imaging of Kepler Objects of Interest. HIRSCH L.A., CIARDI D.R., HOWARD A.W., et al.
2020ApJ...890...23L viz 17       D               1 4935 35 Current population statistics do not favor photoevaporation over core-powered mass loss as the dominant cause of the exoplanet radius gap. LOYD R.O.P., SHKOLNIK E.L., SCHNEIDER A.C., et al.

goto View the references in ADS