1999ApJ...515..153E


Query : 1999ApJ...515..153E

1999ApJ...515..153E - Astrophys. J., 515, 153-168 (1999/April-2)

Satellites as probes of the masses of spiral galaxies.

ERICKSON L.K., GOTTESMAN S.T. and HUNTER J.H.Jr

Abstract (from CDS):

We present H I observations and analyses of the kinematics of 24 satellite-primary galaxy pairs with projected separations between 4.9 and 240 kpc. The satellites have masses of less than 3% of their primary spirals. Two estimates for the masses of the primaries are available, one from their rotation curves and one from the orbital properties of the satellites. Defining χ as the ratio of these two mass estimates, it is a measure of the presence, or absence, of a significant halo. The χ-distribution for these 24 pairs is presented and the selection effects are discussed. Moreover, we show that the χ-distribution of more numerous pairs, with projected separations of less than 200 kpc, identified by Zaritsky et al., after adopting selection criteria quite different from ours, is similar to our χ-distribution. We show that the observational biases have a negligible effect; the biased and unbiased distributions are essentially identical. In order to understand this distribution, N-body calculations were executed to simulate the dynamical behavior of relatively low mass satellites orbiting primary disk galaxies with and without extended halos. The models and the real galaxies were ``observed'' in the same fashion. In addition, we made a partially analytical analysis of the behavior of orbits in a logarithmic potential. We find that a ``generic'' model, characterized by a single disk/halo combination, cannot reproduce the observed P(χ) distribution. However, a simple two-component population of galaxies, composed of not more than 60% with halos and 40% without halos, is successful, if galaxies have dimensions of order 200 kpc. If galaxies are considerably larger with sizes extending to 400 kpc or more, the constraints become more onerous. No generic model can describe the full range of the observed P(χ), particularly if the distribution for rp<200 kpc is compared with that for rp>200 kpc. Regardless of the mix of orbital eccentricities, neither pure halo, nor canonical (disk and halo masses are comparable within the disk radius) models will work. A multicomponent approximation to reality can be constructed for which the canonical model must be mixed with a small fraction of systems essentially devoid of a massive dark halo. Only by including these complexities can the full range of P(χ) be modeled with any degree of success over all radial extents. We show that dynamical friction cannot be ignored in these explorations and that the average mass of a galaxy is in the range of (1-5)x1012 M, with a mass-to-luminosity ratio of at most a few hundred. This is insufficient to close the universe.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters - Galaxies: General - Galaxies: Kinematics and Dynamics

Simbad objects: 30

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 30
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 NGC 147 GiG 00 33 12.120 +48 30 31.46   12.0 9.5     ~ 687 1
2 NGC 187 Sy2 00 39 30.4196917824 -14 39 23.049186300   13   13.52   ~ 26 0
3 M 110 GiG 00 40 22.0572349992 +41 41 07.507220136   8.92 8.07     ~ 1308 1
4 M 32 GiG 00 42 41.82480 +40 51 54.6120 9.51 9.03 8.08     ~ 2154 2
5 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 12639 1
6 NGC 1023 AG? 02 40 24.0133575864 +39 03 47.663392896 10.91 10.35 9.35 7.83   ~ 660 2
7 [SHS82] B1 GiG 05 37.2 +69 11           ~ 3 0
8 NGC 1961 LIN 05 42 04.6327819680 +69 22 42.411028872   11.73 10.99     ~ 337 3
9 [SHS82] A GiG 05 42.5 +69 15           ~ 4 0
10 [SHS82] B GiG 05 43.4 +69 26           ~ 4 0
11 UGC 3342 GiG 05 44 29.6999617176 +69 17 56.345265492   15.20       ~ 44 1
12 UGC 3349 GiG 05 46 31.6652694312 +69 03 03.387245580   14.4       ~ 29 0
13 NGC 3359 EmG 10 46 36.845 +63 13 25.10 10.83 11.03 10.57     ~ 370 1
14 NGC 3893 GiP 11 48 38.207 +48 42 38.84   11.23 10.67     ~ 369 1
15 NGC 3906 AG? 11 49 40.496 +48 25 33.46   14.1       ~ 95 0
16 NGC 3928 AGN 11 51 47.6194275264 +48 40 59.261680020   13.1       ~ 174 0
17 UGC 6923 GiC 11 56 49.526 +53 09 37.21   13.90   12.96   ~ 148 0
18 M 109 GiG 11 57 35.9631479640 +53 22 29.006082336   10.94   9.57   ~ 457 0
19 UGC 6940 AG? 11 57 47.584 +53 14 04.03   16.27   15.59   ~ 37 0
20 UGC 6969 LSB 11 58 47.248 +53 25 32.55   15.07   14.23   ~ 65 0
21 UGC 6983 GiC 11 59 08.734 +52 42 28.03   14.5       ~ 173 0
22 UGC 7089 GiP 12 05 57.746 +43 08 36.08   14.40       ~ 112 1
23 UGC 7094 LSB 12 06 10.774 +42 57 20.85   15.6       ~ 60 0
24 NGC 4111 GiP 12 07 03.1334091672 +43 03 56.345868252 12.07 11.63 10.74     ~ 335 1
25 NGC 4248 GiG 12 17 49.8429850848 +47 24 33.085192824   13.12 12.53     ~ 120 1
26 M 106 Sy2 12 18 57.620 +47 18 13.39   9.14 8.41 8.11   ~ 2362 3
27 M 61 Sy2 12 21 54.9282582888 +04 28 25.597367184 10.07 10.18 9.65     ~ 996 2
28 NGC 4301 GiG 12 22 27.246 +04 33 58.69   13.40 12.99     ~ 122 1
29 NGC 4731 Sy2 12 51 01.095 -06 23 34.98   12.0   16.23 12.0 ~ 176 0
30 NGC 5084 Sy2 13 20 16.923 -21 49 39.28   11.15 12.21 9.84 10.5 ~ 179 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 1999ApJ...515..153E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu