SIMBAD references

2005MNRAS.356..753N - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 356, 753-764 (2005/January-2)

Reconstructing the evolution of white dwarf binaries: further evidence for an alternative algorithm for the outcome of the common-envelope phase in close binaries.


Abstract (from CDS):

We determine the possible masses and radii of the progenitors of white dwarfs in binaries from fits to detailed stellar evolution models and use these to reconstruct the mass-transfer phase in which the white dwarf was formed. We confirm the earlier finding that in the first phase of mass transfer in the binary evolution leading to a close pair of white dwarfs, the standard common-envelope formalism (the α-formalism) equating the energy balance in the system (implicitly assuming angular momentum conservation) does not work. An algorithm equating the angular momentum balance (implicitly assuming energy conservation) can explain the observations. This conclusion is now based on 10 observed systems rather than three. With the latter algorithm (the γ-algorithm) the separation does not change much for approximately equal-mass binaries. Assuming constant efficiency in the standard α-formalism and a constant value of γ, we investigate the effect of both methods on the change in separation in general and conclude that when there is observational evidence for strong shrinkage of the orbit, the γ-algorithm also leads to this. We then extend our analysis to all close binaries with at least one white dwarf component and reconstruct the mass-transfer phases that lead to these binaries. In this way we find all possible values of the efficiency of the standard α-formalism and of γ that can explain the observed binaries for different progenitor and companion masses. We find that all observations can be explained with a single value of γ, making the γ-algorithm a useful tool to predict the outcome of common-envelope evolution. We discuss the consequences of our findings for different binary populations in the Galaxy, including massive binaries, for which the reconstruction method cannot be used.

Abstract Copyright: 2004 RAS

Journal keyword(s): binaries: close - stars: evolution - white dwarfs

CDS comments: PG 1115+116 is a misprint for PG 1115+166. PG 1026 0014 = PG 1026+002. UVO 1735+22 = [CW83] 1735+22.

Simbad objects: 94

goto Full paper

goto View the reference in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2005MNRAS.356..753N and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact