SIMBAD references

Absorption-line systems detected in quasar spectra can be used to compare the value of the fine-structure constant, α, measured today on Earth with its value in distant galaxies. In recent years, some evidence has emerged of small temporal and also spatial variations in α on cosmological scales. These variations may reach a fractional level of ≃10ppm (parts per million). To test these claims we are conducting a Large Program of observations with the Very Large Telescope's Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES), and are obtaining high-resolution (R≃60000) and high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N≃100) UVES spectra calibrated specifically for this purpose. Here we analyse the first complete quasar spectrum from this programme, that of HE2217-2818. We applied the many multiplet method to measure α in five absorption systems towards this quasar: z_abs=0.7866, 0.9424, 1.5558, 1.6279 and 1.6919. The most precise result is obtained for the absorber at z_abs=1.6919 where 3 FeII transitions and AlII λ1670 have high S/N and provide a wide range of sensitivities to α. The absorption profile is complex with several very narrow features, and it requires 32 velocity components to be fitted to the data. We also conducted a range of tests to estimate the systematic error budget. Our final result for the relative variation in α in this system is Δα/α=+1.3±2.4_stat±1.0_sysppm. This is one of the tightest current bounds on α-variation from an individual absorber. A second, separate approach to the data reduction, calibration, and analysis of this system yielded a slightly different result of -3.8ppm, possibly suggesting a larger systematic error component than our tests indicated. This approach used an additional 3 FeII transitions, parts of which were masked due to contamination by telluric features. Restricting this analysis to the FeII transitions alone and using a modified absorption profile model gave a result that is consistent with the first approach, Δα/α=+1.1±2.6_statppm. The four other absorbers have simpler absorption profiles, with fewer and broader features, and offer transitions with a narrower range of sensitivities to α. They therefore provide looser bounds on Δα/α at the >10ppm precision level. The absorbers towards quasar HE2217-2818 reveal no evidence of any variation in α at the 3-ppm precision level (1σ confidence). If the recently reported 10-ppm dipolar variation in α across the sky is correct, the expectation at this sky position is (3.2-5.4)±1.7ppm depending on dipole model used. Our constraint of Δα/α=+1.3±2.4_stat±1.0_sysppm is not inconsistent with this expectation.