2006ApJ...652...85M


Query : 2006ApJ...652...85M

2006ApJ...652...85M - Astrophys. J., 652, 85-96 (2006/November-3)

Evidence for TP-AGB stars in high-redshift galaxies, and their effect on deriving stellar population parameters.

MARASTON C., DADDI E., RENZINI A., CIMATTI A., DICKINSON M., PAPOVICH C., PASQUALI A. and PIRZKAL N.

Abstract (from CDS):

We explore the effects of using different stellar population models on estimates of star formation histories, ages, and masses of high-redshift galaxies by fitting the SEDs with models by Maraston (hereafter M05) and by Bruzual & Charlot (hereafter BC03). We focus on the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) phase of stellar evolution, whose treatment is a source of major discrepancy. In this respect, BC03 models are representative of other models whose treatment of the TP-AGB phase is similar. Moreover, M05 and BC03 models adopt stellar tracks with different assumptions on convective overshooting. For our experiment we use a sample of high-z (1.4≲z≲2.7) galaxies, for which rest-frame UV spectroscopy and spectroscopic redshifts are available, along with Spitzer IRAC and MIPS photometry from GOODS. The mid-UV spectra of these galaxies exhibit features typical of A- or F-type stars, indicative of ages in the range ∼0.2-2 Gyr, when the contribution of TP-AGB stars is expected to be maximum. We find that the TP-AGB phase plays a key role in the interpretation of the Spitzer data, where the rest-frame near-IR is sampled. Generally, M05 models give better fits than BC03 models and indicate systematically lower ages and lower masses (by ∼60%, on average). Photometric redshifts derived using M05 models are also in better agreement with the spectroscopic ones, especially when the rest-frame near-IR fluxes from Spitzer IRAC are included in the fit. We argue that the different results are primarily a consequence of the different treatment of the TP-AGB phase, although other differences in the input stellar evolution also contribute. This work provides a first direct evidence for a strong contribution by TP-AGB stars to the SED of galaxies in the high-redshift universe (z∼2).

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): Galaxies: Evolution - Galaxies: Formation - Galaxies: High-Redshift - Stars: AGB and Post-AGB

Errata: erratum vol. 656, p. 1241 (2007)

CDS comments: Table 1 : UDF 4650 is a misprint for UDF 4950

Simbad objects: 12

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 12
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 11178 1
2 M 77 Sy2 02 42 40.7091669408 -00 00 47.859690204 9.70 9.61 8.87 10.1 9.9 ~ 4610 2
3 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 J 1 1038 G 03 32 30.022 -27 47 26.80   25.2428   24.621 23.8644 ~ 37 0
4 [SWM2014] GOODS-S 24289 AGN 03 32 33.677 -27 47 51.09   28.1169 28.33 26.52 25.300 ~ 34 0
5 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 J 1 794 G 03 32 36.912 -27 46 28.52   29.0062 27.32 26.86 25.5969 ~ 35 0
6 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 Ks 1 2280 G 03 32 38.113 -27 47 49.77 28.7063 27.2362 26.29 26.10 25.4189 ~ 40 0
7 NAME Hubble Ultra Deep Field reg 03 32 39.0 -27 47 29           ~ 1675 0
8 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 Ks 1 2279 G 03 32 39.120 -27 47 51.57   28.6930 27.07 27.31 26.4665 ~ 34 0
9 CXOCDFS J033239.2-274833 AGN 03 32 39.173 -27 48 32.35   28.180   26.63 26.045 ~ 58 1
10 ACS-GC 90044579 AGN 03 32 43.038 -27 48 45.09   26.3069 25.14 25.56 24.431 ~ 51 0
11 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 17478 0
12 Mrk 231 Sy1 12 56 14.2341182928 +56 52 25.238373852   14.68 13.84     ~ 1990 3

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2006ApJ...652...85M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu