2005ApJ...635...35K


Query : 2005ApJ...635...35K

2005ApJ...635...35K - Astrophys. J., 635, 35-59 (2005/December-2)

Identifying lenses with small-scale structure. II. Fold lenses.

KEETON C.R., GAUDI B.S. and PETTERS A.O.

Abstract (from CDS):

When the source in a four-image gravitational lens system lies sufficiently close to a ``fold'' caustic, two of the lensed images lie very close together. If the lens potential is smooth on the scale of the separation between the two close images, the difference between their fluxes should approximately vanish, Rfold≡(F+-F)/(F++F)~0. (The subscript indicates the image parity.) Violations of this ``fold relation'' in observed lenses are thought to indicate the presence of structure on scales smaller than the separation between the close images. We present a detailed study of the fold relation in realistic smooth lenses, finding it to be more subtle and rich than was previously realized. The degree to which Rfoldcan differ from zero for smooth lenses depends not only on the distance of the source from the caustic, but also on its location along the caustic, and then on the angular structure of the lens potential (ellipticity, multipole modes, and external shear). Since the source position is unobservable, it is impossible to say from Rfoldalone whether the flux ratios in an observed lens are anomalous or not. Instead, we must consider the full distribution of Rfoldvalues that can be obtained from smooth lens potentials that reproduce the separation d1between the two close images and the distance d2to the next nearest image. (By reducing the image configuration to these two numbers, we limit our model dependence and obtain a generic analysis.) We show that the generic features of this distribution can be understood, which means that the fold relation provides a robust probe of small-scale structure in lens galaxies. We then compute the full distribution using Monte Carlo simulations of realistic smooth lenses. Comparing these predictions with the data, we find that five of the 12 known lenses with fold configurations have flux ratio anomalies: B0712+472, SDSS 0924+0219, PG 1115+080, B1555+375, and B1933+503. Combining this with our previous analysis revealing anomalies in three of the four known lenses with cusp configurations, we conclude that at least half (8/16) of all four-image lenses that admit generic, local analyses exhibit flux ratio anomalies. The fold and cusp relations do not reveal the nature of the implied small-scale structure, but do provide the formal foundation for substructure studies, and also indicate which lenses deserve further study. Although our focus is on close pairs of images, we show that the fold relation can be used–with great care–to analyze all image pairs in all 22 known four-image lenses and reveal lenses with some sort of interesting structure.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): Cosmology: Theory - Cosmology: Dark Matter - Galaxies: Formation - Cosmology: Gravitational Lensing - Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe

Simbad objects: 30

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 30
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 [WHL96] 0047-2808 Einstein Ring LeI 00 49 41.86 -27 52 25.7           ~ 28 1
2 CLASS B0128+437 Rad 01 31 +44.0           ~ 59 0
3 QSO B0132-097 QSO 01 34 35.6657627616 -09 31 02.903742300   24.52 22.70 20.80   ~ 110 1
4 [VV2000] J023233.1-211726 QSO 02 32 33.1 -21 17 26     18.10     ~ 52 1
5 4C 05.19 QSO 04 14 37.76734974 +05 34 42.3295956   24.100 23.800 21.270   ~ 360 2
6 [VV2006] J043814.8-122314 QSO 04 38 14.88 -12 17 14.6     17.15     ~ 222 2
7 QSO B0712+472 QSO 07 16 03.65 +47 08 50.6     23.0     ~ 110 1
8 QSO B0908+0603 QSO 09 11 27.6052 +05 50 54.281   18.44 18.16     ~ 233 2
9 QSO J0924+0219 QSO 09 24 55.8048 +02 19 24.850   18.58 18.36     ~ 138 1
10 8C 0958+561 QSO 10 01 20.6918953728 +55 53 55.593949272   17.16 16.95     ~ 735 3
11 QSO J1004+4112 QSO 10 04 34.9243842216 +41 12 42.771018060   19.14 19.03     ~ 191 1
12 QSO B1115+080A QSO 11 18 16.951 +07 45 58.23   16.61 16.44     ~ 684 2
13 2MASS J11315154-1231588 Sy1 11 31 51.5387 -12 31 58.716           ~ 270 1
14 [RGO99] HST J12531-2914 G 12 53 06.70 -29 14 30.0           ~ 26 0
15 ACO 1656 ClG 12 59 44.40 +27 54 44.9           ~ 4813 2
16 QSO B1359+154 QSO 14 01 35.588 +15 13 24.15     21.90     ~ 73 1
17 ClG J1411+5211 ClG 14 11 24.4 +52 12 38     20.11     ~ 118 3
18 QSO J1415+1129 QSO 14 15 46.25 +11 29 43.4   17.63 17.23     ~ 651 0
19 CFRS 14.1311 G 14 17 35.70 +52 26 45.9   24.04 21.53 21.38 19.971 ~ 62 1
20 [MMN2007] A1 gLS 14 17 35.9 +52 26 46     21.53   19.69 ~ 71 0
21 QSO B1422+2309 BLL 14 24 38.0938 +22 56 00.587   16.77 15.84 14.79   ~ 450 1
22 [PBW92] 1422+231 gLS 14 24 38.09400 +22 56 00.5900   16.77 15.84 14.79   ~ 356 0
23 CLASS B1555+375 LeQ 15 57 11.884 +37 21 35.80           ~ 44 0
24 NVSS J160914+653229 rG 16 09 13.96 +65 32 28.8     19.4     ~ 206 1
25 CLASS B1933+503 Rad 19 34 31.02 +50 25 23.5           ~ 84 1
26 [VV2006] J202610.4-453627 QSO 20 26 10.45 -45 36 27.1           ~ 49 1
27 [VV2006] J203342.1-472343 QSO 20 33 42.12 -47 23 43.9           ~ 124 1
28 [VV2000] J204719.3+264340 QSO 20 47 20.3 +26 44 03     20.60     ~ 110 2
29 QSO J2240+0321 QSO 22 40 30.234 +03 21 30.63           ~ 675 1
30 Z 378-15 G 22 40 30.23447 +03 21 30.6290           ~ 632 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2005ApJ...635...35K and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu