2018A&A...616A.104K


Query : 2018A&A...616A.104K

2018A&A...616A.104K - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 616A, 104-104 (2018/8-1)

Non-linear seismic scaling relations.

KALLINGER T., BECK P.G., STELLO D. and GARCIA R.A.

Abstract (from CDS):


Context. In recent years the global seismic scaling relations for the frequency of maximum power, νmax∝g/Teff1/2, and for the large frequency separation, Δν∝(ρ{bar})1/2, have drawn attention in various fields of astrophysics. This is because these relations can be used to estimate parameters, such as the mass and radius of stars that show solar-like oscillations. With the exquisite photometry of Kepler, the uncertainties in the seismic observables are small enough to estimate masses and radii with a precision of only a few per cent. Even though this seems to work quite well for main-sequence stars, there is empirical evidence, mainly from studies of eclipsing binary systems, that the seismic scaling relations systematically overestimate the mass and radius of red giants by about 15% and 5%, respectively. Various model-based corrections of the Δν-scaling reduce the problem but do not solve it.
Aims. Our goal is to define revised seismic scaling relations that account for the known systematic mass and radius discrepancies in a completely model-independent way.
Methods. We use probabilistic methods to analyse the seismic data and to derive non-linear scaling relations based on a sample of six red giant branch (RGB) stars that are members of eclipsing binary systems and about 60 red giants on the RGB as well as in the core-helium burning red clump (RC) in the two open clusters NGC 6791 and NGC 6819.
Results. We re-examine the global oscillation parameters of the giants in the binary systems in order to determine their seismic fundamental parameters and we find them to agree with the dynamic parameters from the literature if we adopt non-linear scalings. We note that a curvature and glitch corrected Δνcor should be preferred over a local or average value of Δν. We then compare the observed seismic parameters of the cluster giants to those scaled from independent measurements and find the same non-linear behaviour as for the eclipsing binaries. Our final proposed scaling relations are based on both samples and cover a broad range of evolutionary stages from RGB to RC stars: g/Teff1/2=(νmaxmax,☉)1.0075±0.0021 and (ρ{bar})1/2=(Δνcor/Δνcor,☉)[η-(0.0085±0.0025)log2(Δνcor/Δνcor,☉)]–1 where g, Teff, and ρ{bar} are in solar units, νmax,☉=3140±5µHz and Δνcor,☉=135.08±0.02µHz, and η is equal to one in the case of RGB stars and 1.04±0.01 for RC stars.
Conclusions. A direct consequence of these new scaling relations is that the average mass of stars on the ascending giant branch reduces to 1.10±0.03M in NGC 6791 and 1.45±0.06M in NGC 6819, allowing us to revise the clusters' distance modulus to 13.11±0.03 and 11.91±0.03mag, respectively. We also find strong evidence that both clusters are significantly older than concluded from previous seismic investigations.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2018

Journal keyword(s): stars: fundamental parameters - stars: oscillations - stars: late-type - stars: interiors - open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 6819 - open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 6791

Simbad objects: 18

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 18
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 TYC 3130-2385-1 EB* 18 48 38.0888392752 +44 29 09.855904776   12.18 11.33     ~ 55 0
2 TYC 3546-941-1 RG* 19 07 49.3734544464 +46 56 11.865353964   11.48 10.39     ~ 38 0
3 NGC 6791 OpC 19 20 53.0 +37 46 41   10.52 9.5     ~ 1040 0
4 2MASS J19210141+4101049 EB* 19 21 01.4107302168 +41 01 04.925030484           K2III 27 0
5 2MASS J19315429+4232516 RG* 19 31 54.2896822536 +42 32 51.641296872           ~ 35 0
6 HD 185351 PM* 19 36 37.9768465728 +44 41 41.761562352   6.109 5.169     G8.5IIIbFe-0.5 144 0
7 2MASS J19364769+3945288 RG* 19 36 47.6957334360 +39 45 28.737722448           ~ 26 0
8 NGC 6819 112 RG* 19 40 49.6541452533 +40 14 31.281979204     13.370   12.09 G5III 46 0
9 NGC 6819 510 RG* 19 40 57.0425593485 +40 10 06.814776515     13.320   12.00 ~ 35 0
10 NGC 6819 665 EB* 19 40 57.8289183792 +40 09 27.378762912   15.82 15.17   14.38 ~ 29 0
11 NGC 6819 851 EB* 19 41 16.8472356840 +40 07 27.518284056   15.714 15.090   14.34 ~ 23 0
12 NGC 6819 OpC 19 41 18.5 +40 11 24   8.21 7.3     ~ 635 0
13 TYC 3557-2118-1 EB* 19 41 20.9933729592 +45 30 17.199878004   10.67 9.82     G5 23 0
14 NGC 6819 259 EB* 19 41 33.9265890792 +40 13 00.247822320   16.356 15.651   14.774 ~ 38 1
15 2MASS J19434330+4257043 EB* 19 43 43.3026322992 +42 57 04.280814252           ~ 21 0
16 TYC 3557-221-1 EB* 19 48 08.1620215896 +46 11 54.564197784   12.75 12.44     G6V 47 0
17 KOI-7606 RG* 19 54 50.3553370248 +46 49 58.910407356           G6V 44 0
18 HD 190585 EB* 20 03 48.3209367264 +45 36 14.805207576   10.74 9.65     K2 42 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2018A&A...616A.104K and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu